![]() |
Charles Darwin |
On this day (12th February) in the year 1809, the
naturalist Charles Darwin was born. Two hundred and seven years later, we are still
celebrating him and his contribution to science - the process of evolution by
natural selection. Darwin was the first to theorise that all forms of life had
common ancestry and that species had diverged due to nature driving adaption to
various environmental pressures, such as temperature, habitation, competition, food
supply and predators.
An excellent example of this can be seen in a comparison of
the polar bear to its closest relative – the brown bear. Between 350,000 and 6
million years ago, these bears were just one species which then became
separated into different geographical regions. These ancestors when first
arriving in snowy conditions were various shades of brown, but those with
lighter coloured and thicker fur will have had a better chance of successfully
hunting in the snow, surviving the cold and therefore producing offspring, the
critical factor of natural selection.
![]() |
Brown bear and polar bear originate from the same species |
The next generation of bears also had had
a range of fur colour and thickness -but overall a greater proportion is more
likely to have lighter coloured, thicker fur. In this way, traits more likely
to improve reproductive success are enriched in populations, and those that are
detrimental are not passed onto the next generation. Over thousands to millions
of years, the accumulation of these small changes between generations can
produce drastic differences when comparing modern species in the present day. We
now know these changes in physical characteristics are due to alterations in
DNA, which encodes the genetic information to produce all forms of life.
This includes humans too; our closest relative is the chimpanzee! We share 99% of our DNA with chimps, and it is estimated our species diverged approximately 5-8 million years ago. That 1% makes a big difference though, and one of the greatest differences has been the rapid development of our brains. Not only are our brains larger, but we have developed particular regions of the brain and processes that greatly improve our cognitive function, fine control of our hands, memory, and ability to socialise and communicate.
This includes humans too; our closest relative is the chimpanzee! We share 99% of our DNA with chimps, and it is estimated our species diverged approximately 5-8 million years ago. That 1% makes a big difference though, and one of the greatest differences has been the rapid development of our brains. Not only are our brains larger, but we have developed particular regions of the brain and processes that greatly improve our cognitive function, fine control of our hands, memory, and ability to socialise and communicate.
In 1989 a scientist named Rapoport first suggested that problems
in the brain leading to Alzheimer’s Disease were occurring in the brain regions
and processes developed recently in the human lineage. He also suggested that
perhaps these new regions were more susceptible to errors as they had had less
time to “perfect” than earlier established regions of the brain, common to a
broad range of the animal kingdom. More recently, a group in California found
that Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), a disease which affects human aspects of
social behaviour and emotion, was caused by a loss of spindle neurons; a type
of cell evolved only in apes and humans and much more abundant in human
brains.
Whilst evolution has shaped the development of our higher
brain function, which has proved greatly advantageous to our species, the
associated neurodegeneration has only been recently exposed through
improvements in lifespan allowing an aged population never previously seen in chimpanzees
or early populations of humans. Evolution through natural selection has been
seemingly unable to affect the frequency of neurodegenerative diseases, as the
late-age onset means it has usually no bearing on whether or not someone has
children and passes on their DNA to the next generation.
There is a fine balance between the gain of higher capacity
for dexterity, gait, memory, language skills etc. that distinguishes us from
our ape cousins, and a vulnerability to neurodegenerative diseases as we age.
An evolutionary perspective on neurodegenerative diseases might help to further
understand underlying problems and improve our model systems, but clearly
highlights the importance of taking the matter of combating neurodegenerative
diseases into our own hands!
By Phillippa Carling
Phillippa is a postdoctoral researcher funded by Parkinson’s UK in Professor Oliver Bandmann’s group, working on mitochondrial dysfunction in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. You can find out more about her work on ResearchGate and LinkedIN.
No comments:
Post a comment